In the 15th century on ascension of Charles VII to
the throne after the death of his father, the reigning king, the French
proclaimed 'Le roi est mort, vive le roi!’, The King is dead,
Long live the king.
Much the same holds for the Congress today. What the outcome of state 2017
polls should bring home to party leaders is that its legacies of the freedom
movement, sacrifices, tall leaderships, contribution to nation building or to
put it all succinctly, its hoary past, are layered too deep down in archaeological
remains of time to resonate with millennials or even the generation before it.
Seventy years is a long time in political history of a post-war world . So, the
present legatees of INC must acknowledge, however agonising it may be, the king
is dead.
Yet as the French said, the
king must live long. The liberties, more importantly, the freedom to create and
exploit opportunities in all fields of human endeavour and peaceful enjoyment
of its fruits; the three D’s, freedom to discuss, debate and dissent; the freedom
to pursue one's religious ethos subject to the common weal, lie at the core of
a democratic body politic. State, by all reckoning is a necessary evil,
deserving of an unending vigil by the lay. As Thomas Jefferson said ' A
government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take
everything you have '. And that is best thwarted
by an able and strong opposition voicing the counter view.
And who knows the virtues of
dissent and consensus better than the Congress? Its founding premise was
consensus building. It may seem confounding that the Congress A O Hume founded
was an amorphous party; an umbrella organisation seamlessly accommodating leaders
with various bents of ideology, from a Fabian socialist like Nehru, a Swarajist
C R Das, a moderate G K Gokhale, an Arya Samajist Lajpat Rai, or a Hindu
fundamentalist Shyama Prasad Mukherjee. Remember, Subhas Chandra Bose founded
Forward Block 'within’ the Congress. So there never was a dearth of dissenting
voices and consensus building in the party.
Post-Independence, as
splinters broke off from Congress to chart their own fortunes, it kept ,unwittingly, creating more political space for its
opponents outside its fold. S P Mukherjee broke off to form Jan Sangh, JB
Kripalani formed the Kisan Majdoor Praja Party to give company to Socialist
Party formed earlier in 1949. And not to forget, The Jharkhand Party of Jaipal
Singh Munda. In fact, the subsequent history of Congress is one of ceding more
and more of its political space to offshoots.
What now remains is a pale
shadow of itself, a shrunken hulk beaten down from all sides. So much has been
written and talked about and requiems sung, often with unconcealed malicious glee, on Congress's impending
demise, that further recounting is superfluous.
One, however, wouldn’t have
mourned building a cemetery for Congress had it not held an insidious portent.
While Congress's downslide has been contemporaneous with rise in political
space for the opposition, including BJP, contrarily, BJP's ascendency has seen
a concomitant and unobtrusive contraction of space for others. As BJP goes
about creating a Congress-Mukt Bharat, what used to be opposition domain,
contracts. But there is a qualitative change from the past . Take for instance
Arunachal Pradesh. Congress, stands obliterated in the wake of BJP's Congress
mukt 'pogrom' and there is none to take its place. Shiv Sena is slowly but
surely asphyxiating and ceding space, not to the opposition, but to BJP. Again,
sure-footed BJP is steadily pushing BJD to the brink. Most non-BJP, non-Congress
parties have little pan India presence. The
possibility of any acquiring a national footprint is too remote. So,
there is real apprehension that in the
present scenario of an effete Congress, any regional party or the Congress getting
pushed over by BJP there will be an enduring, unexpansive shrinkage of
political space for opposition. The trend will only accentuate further as one-
man parties lose their fountainhead. Unless Congress, the only other party with
a national footprint, emerges from its moribund existence and fills this breach
,loss of opposition space becomes enduring. Hence the king must live long.
Not the 'dead ' king, of course!
INC must exuviate and emerge with a skin and sheen adapted to the rigours and
opportunities inhering in an upwardly mobile aspirational society. First and foremost,
it must de-learn the way it used to carry on business, learn to offer political
dreams in consonance with those of the millenials who are now increasingly
driving political agendas. That is the biggest challenge before INC ,how to
reinvent itself by burning its boat, by abandoning its legacy baggage. The party does
not lack intellectual capital. If invested properly it can conjure up a right
fit of ideas, strategies and boots on the ground to implement it in right
earnest. And it must, if freedoms are not to
be imperilled and risk of ‘Hinduisation’ of a secular socio-polity allayed.
Will Rahul Gandhi show party
the way? Well, if popular media is to be believed his political epitaph was
written way back in 2012, when his first intensive foray into poll campaigning
in UP state polls flattered only to deceive collecting a measly seats haul of
28. Each round of subsequent electoral flops merely itched deeper the writing
on the epitaph. Success and failures speak different languages. So, the
standards by which media judges the poor fellow are much harsher; a Modi can
get away with telling people of Alexander and Taxila being in Bihar or
distorting Rahul Gandhi (RG) reference to pineapple juice to coconut juice, but
RG speaking of potato factory while talking of food processing factory gets
mentioned by Modi and splashed in the media. This, sadly, is symptomatic of the
gradual evolution of a uni-directional media narrative with nothing in it for
the opposition. Besides an uncharitable press, RG has also inherited a
decadent organisation. At the same time his probation period in Congress
leadership is getting interminably prolonged. He must come up with a winning
political recipe and make national polity truly bipolar. The party must do a genuine
manthan, and better do it open to public gaze and participation. Why not revive
the practice of holding, unfailingly, annual Congress conventions open to all workers?
And no matter how critical the
party maybe of media pre-empting a call on RG leadership, one that is only the
party's take, its feedback is valuable nonetheless. Party honchos will ignore
it only at it peril. Though in throes of an existential threat, INC must stand a
national vigil for the values that animated the freedom movement and got enshrined
in the constitution. It’s a big ask.
Uneasy must lie the head that
shoulders this burden!
Aptly written sir. Congess has become a thing to be written about. It was a King, it had legacy, it had class,but 'had' sometimes doesn't work. Now with the advent of mobile and screenstuck generation, it needs 'has'!
ReplyDeleteLife at times becomes very cruel if you don't have the ability to change. Congress has become Ambassador, though having great history not suitable in present situation. It needs change , it needs to be revived. It needs better leaders but who cares ?
Very true ! Congress needs to reinvent itself .
ReplyDelete